Having replaced their Jack Boots for Prada pumps, the new Storm Troopers of the left have, typically, become white upper middle class women with a chip on their shoulder.
First, we have Janet Napolitano, Chief of the Department of Homeland Security, who has painted, with a broad brush, anyone who would question government policies, support a third party candidate or, merely, be a Veteran returing home from the Middle East, as a "Right Wing Extremist" and someone who bears surveillance by local law enforcement. Clearly Ms. Napolitano has abused her office to exact retribution, through name calling and referral of such persons to law enforcement, on any citizen who will not walk in lock step with the current administration.
Can I get a Sieg Heil here?
Then there is the activist reporter, Susan Roesgen, working for CNN who, while interviewing a Tea Party participant, lost any pretense of objectivity and became rude, angry and argumentative at the Tea Party concept and, ultimately, berated the individual whom she was interviewing, choosing to denigrate all Tea Party participants by stating that this nationwide movement was being staged by Fox News.
Can we get a Sieg Heil for Susan?
Then there is the tale of two geniuses.
In a recent interview, conducted by Keith Olbermann on MSNBC, Janeane Garafolo stated that all who attended the Tea Parties were racist. Yes folks, in her interview she, immediately, played the "Race Card". Why you might ask? Because after this gauntlet is thrown down, there is no need to discuss the real issues that commenced the Tea Parties, issues which Ms. Garafolo was, obviously, not prepared to discuss. The fact that Keith Olbermann gave her a podium is not remarkable as he is a lifelong liberal elitist operating under the pretense of being a journalist.
Can we get a Sieg Hiel for Janeane? Can we get a second Sieg Hiel for Keith?
So this is the new face of of the Storm Trooper Liberals and their Blitzkrieg to silence honest discussion and dissent over government policies. If you disagree with the government the liberal elite will go after you with a vengeance, calling you every vile, nasty name they can conjure up, then they will advise local law enforcement to place you under surveillance.
If this makes you angry and you are thinking about voting for a third party candidate in the future, you should keep this decision a secret. According to the Department of Homeland Security, supporting a third party candidate also makes you a "Right Wing Extremist".
First, we have Janet Napolitano, Chief of the Department of Homeland Security, who has painted, with a broad brush, anyone who would question government policies, support a third party candidate or, merely, be a Veteran returing home from the Middle East, as a "Right Wing Extremist" and someone who bears surveillance by local law enforcement. Clearly Ms. Napolitano has abused her office to exact retribution, through name calling and referral of such persons to law enforcement, on any citizen who will not walk in lock step with the current administration.
Can I get a Sieg Heil here?
Then there is the activist reporter, Susan Roesgen, working for CNN who, while interviewing a Tea Party participant, lost any pretense of objectivity and became rude, angry and argumentative at the Tea Party concept and, ultimately, berated the individual whom she was interviewing, choosing to denigrate all Tea Party participants by stating that this nationwide movement was being staged by Fox News.
Can we get a Sieg Heil for Susan?
Then there is the tale of two geniuses.
In a recent interview, conducted by Keith Olbermann on MSNBC, Janeane Garafolo stated that all who attended the Tea Parties were racist. Yes folks, in her interview she, immediately, played the "Race Card". Why you might ask? Because after this gauntlet is thrown down, there is no need to discuss the real issues that commenced the Tea Parties, issues which Ms. Garafolo was, obviously, not prepared to discuss. The fact that Keith Olbermann gave her a podium is not remarkable as he is a lifelong liberal elitist operating under the pretense of being a journalist.
Can we get a Sieg Hiel for Janeane? Can we get a second Sieg Hiel for Keith?
So this is the new face of of the Storm Trooper Liberals and their Blitzkrieg to silence honest discussion and dissent over government policies. If you disagree with the government the liberal elite will go after you with a vengeance, calling you every vile, nasty name they can conjure up, then they will advise local law enforcement to place you under surveillance.
If this makes you angry and you are thinking about voting for a third party candidate in the future, you should keep this decision a secret. According to the Department of Homeland Security, supporting a third party candidate also makes you a "Right Wing Extremist".
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=94803
http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G3fvNhdoc0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IeRxVMpyDg
4 comments:
You hit the nail on the head, Joe. I think the right politicians I voted for let me down and now we have to endure this garbage until the right can come up with a decent candidate and get back to a good check and balance. It seems the people that voted this all left politician mess we have were not thinking and many of them attended the tea parties and are now sorry they voted the way they did.
Wake up Washington! We the people is everyone, not just you! The Republicans made that mistake and look what happened!
Mel
Good point Mel,
While I have been a life long Republican, I will be voting Libertarian which, under Janet Napolitano's DHS report makes me a "Right Wing Extremist". I'm sure that I will be placed on a DHS watch list somewhere.
While I respect McCain and his military sacrifices, this was NOT enough to get enough Republicans to vote for him (obviously). The post, election trashing, of Sarah Palin by the McCain campaign staff, obviously to obfuscate their failures, was enough for me to go to Libertarian. It was shameful!
The Republicans need to build their party from the ground up and I think the new Republican Party Chair, Michael Steele, gets it. He has a conservative, pro-life, philosophy and he is in a position to influence the Republicans back to the party of reason and away from the "Me-Too" Democratic sycophants they have become.
From the DHS report on right wing extremism:
Rightwing extremism in the U.S. can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those who are mainly anti-government, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.
http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf
So I don't see where the following quote from Joe applies, or doesn't that matter?
"First, we have Janet Napolitano, Chief of the Department of Homeland Security, who has painted, with a broad brush, anyone who would question government policies, support a third party candidate or, merely, be a Veteran returing home from the Middle East, as a 'Right Wing Extremist' and someone who bears surveillance by local law enforcement."
Why on earth davidasearles@yahoo.com chose to quote one small footnote found on page two of this nine (9) page report is beyond me. Somehow he was drawn to that footnote because, presumably, he believes it disputes the rest of the report which contains the information I presented here.
More left wing cherry picking will not change the report Dave, it says what it says and it says a lot more than can be found in your citation of the small footnote on page two.
Let the reader make their own conclusion:
http://wnd.com/images/dhs-rightwing-extremism.pdf
Joe Bradley
Post a Comment