Thursday, September 4, 2008

The Non-Issues of the left.

From time to time I spar, in one of the local liberal tabloids, with mean spirited liberals.

What is most shocking to one in particular, who goes by the NOM De Plum of "Notta Bushman" is the ability of conservative posters to, unashamedly, involve themselves in compelling dialog regarding the hypocrisy of the Democrats while, simultaneously, fending off and responding to the ad hominem attacks of the lefties.

I offer this response as an example:

=========================

For the entire thread, CLICK HERE.

Notta, you are, indeed, an interesting individual. You equate four counts of felonious fraud with unwed motherhood. Through your analogy you seem to seek the incarceration of all unwed mothers, throwing them into the same cell as Jimmy Ryan. What is your next step toward your utopian society, legalizing honor killings?

You should put your Quran down for a moment and acquire a Bible and read Luke 15:11-32. It probably wouldn't do any good because, after reading this, you would still hold the father of the Prodigal Son responsible for the sins of his son.

Now let's address YOUR subject (once again) of judgement. We know Joe Biden has had, in the past, (to be kind) a person of questionable ethics working on his campaign in New Hampshire. As of Friday September 5, 2008 he was in jail for violating a sentencing agreement for four counts of fraud in a prior Carroll County case dating back to 1992. Let's take a look at Obama, shall we?


CHANGE #1: Despite Pledging To Withdraw American Troops From Iraq Immediately, Barack Obama Now Says He Would "Refine" His Policy After Listening To The Commanders On The Ground.

CHANGE #2: Despite Pledging To Accept Public Financing, Barack Obama Has Reversed His Position And Opted Out Of The System.

CHANGE #3: Barack Obama Is Backtracking On His Support For Unilaterally Renegotiating NAFTA

CHANGE #4: Barack Obama Is Considering Reducing Corporate Taxes Despite Having Called Corporate Tax Cuts "The Exact Wrong Prescription For America"

CHANGE #5: Barack Obama Has Changed Positions On The D.C. Handgun Ban

CHANGE #6: Barack Obama Has Shifted From Opposing Welfare Reform To Celebrating Welfare Reform

CHANGE #7: As A Presidential Candidate, Barack Obama Criticizes The Administration's Energy Policy Despite Having Voted For The 2005 Bush-Cheney Energy Bill

CHANGE #8: Barack Obama Has Shifted Positions On Nuclear Power

CHANGE #9: Obama Adviser Said Obama Was Not Opposed To An Individual Health Care Mandate Despite His Opposition During The Primary

CHANGE #10: During The Primaries, Barack Obama Pledged To Filibuster Any Bill Which Contained Immunity For Telecommunications Companies Involved In Electronic Surveillance, But Now Backs A Compromise Bill

. . . . . and on and on and on, however, I'm sure it is falling on deaf ears with you Notta because YOUR focus is, obviously, criminalizing unwed motherhood and throwing all the unwed mothers in prison with the fraud mongers, then holding the parents of the unwed mothers responsible for their daughter's indiscretion.

Strange how you NEVER attempt to hold Joe Biden's parents responsible for the error in judgement that Joe committed when he appointed Jimmy Ryan (felonious convict) as his New Hampshire campaign coordinator. Did they teach you that in the Mosque?

P.S. The story on Ryan came from the Associated Press, but, I'm sure if it doesn't appear in the Weekly World News or Dell Comics you wouldn't know of it.
-- Posted by Joe Bradley on Wed, Sep 3, 2008, 11:03 am EST

3 comments:

Michael Ejercito said...

Here is an example of change that Obama did not believe in.

Hale DeMar faced a life or death decision on December 28, 2003.

That night, the fifty-nine-year-old Wilmette, Illinois resident woke up to find a burglar attempting to break into his home. He had experienced a burglary not long before

As he explained in his letter to the Chicago Sun Times:

"For me, the seconds until I found my children still safely tucked in their beds were horrifying … The police were called and in routine fashion they came, took the report and with little concern left, promising to increase surveillance. Little comfort, since the invader now had keys to our home and our automobiles. The police informed me that this was not an uncommon event in east Wilmette and offered their condolences …"

DeMar confronted the criminal and shot him; the criminal subsequently fled.

While Cook County prosecutors determined that DeMar acted lawfully, the village of Wilmette prosecuted him for violating the handgun ban.

The people of Illinois were outraged. The Democratic-majority legislature passed a law that would allow people who use handguns to deter or defend against intruders into their homes to assert self-defense if prosecuted for violating local handgun bans; the House passed it by 86-25 and the Senate passed this by 38-20. Clearly, the Illinois legislature saw the plain need for change in Illinois's laws.

Senator Barack Obama voted against this law. This was change he did not believe in.

Mel Hewitt said...

Ok, now Senator Obama is too important to go to Washington and do his job as a Senator. Why shouldn’t he be held accountable for just talking on the phone to the leaders instead of being there in person? If he were President, would he handle a crisis on the phone from a foreign land? Maybe since he favors Muslims, he would handle a crisis from Saudi Arabia instead of flying home on AF-1. He has flip flopped on so many issues and seems to be typical when he merely tells us what we want to hear, as any good politician does. I’m not saying that the other side of the isle has never done that, since they all do. Do you believe former Democrat leaders and vote Obama or do you follow the lead of the most successful people (like Trump and Warren Buffet) in our country and vote for McCain? I believe the way to make us strong again is to lower taxes and regulation. This bailout stuff is dangerous. Yes we have a clogged financial market. So if we take the assets of drug dealers when caught, we should take the assets of the CEOs, corporate officers and officials accountable and put them in jail for creating this. When we through them in jail we should seize their assets to pay the tax payers for bailing out these failing companies. If you play you should be willing to pay! These people are messing up the economy and will inevitably find themselves speaking and advising or just consulting for the news and making the big bucks for messing up. So frustrating, I am just going to buy a jar of lube and get ready to bend over since the big guys are not going to pay for this, the small guy will!

Michael Ejercito said...

So if we take the assets of drug dealers when caught, we should take the assets of the CEOs, corporate officers and officials accountable and put them in jail for creating this.
What laws have they broken?